Statistics: Who will be the best ruler of the Seven Kingdoms

He has many good qualities as a ruler and, most importantly, the absence of moral suffering due to dishonorable acts for the benefit of others.

Wise, cunning, powerful, rich, noble, a good field commander, so many qualities, why is he not a king (although he was not formally one, but was actually under Jofri)

She has already managed to prove herself as a caring queen, but wasn't this a good game for the sake of popular support?

Kind, honest and fair, and most importantly principled, that's what killed him.

He rose from a small man to Lord Harenhal, defender of the Arryn Valley and potential guardian or king of the north. With the power of more than half of the lands of Westeros, he could seize the Iron throne.

The traditional qualities of the Starks: bravery, kindness, self-sacrifice for the sake of family and duty. Well, he would have become the first white walker on the Iron throne.

A rootless eunuch who does everything for the state. Perhaps he would be the king who cares most about the welfare of the people.

Everyone's favorite Misa, but by the end of the series she became cruel and vindictive. Justifying her by losing people she cares about is a bad idea, because even in anger and despair, you need to keep your mind.

Calculating, cunning and wise. But even if she becomes a good queen, she will not rule for long, and can we say that her children and grandchildren will be good rulers.

She has experienced many tragedies and many people who have made her strong and smart.

"We underestimated the Stark boy, he's good at military and people adore him," Tywin Lanister

He takes over everything from his mental father, both bravery and valor, and his weaknesses. He was the king of the North and also has a claim to the Iron throne.

Regicide, sinner, cripple, perjurer. And also kind, faithful to the oath. He is someone who has really changed over time.

A noble and brave warrior, honest and merciful. But can a knight without castles and a house become a great king?

And why not?

Brave, brave and devoted to his home.

He is fair, brave and easily influenced by beautiful priestesses.

She agreed to Daenerys' suggestion, namely to give up piracy, which means to stop being Ironborn. All this means that she is ready for decisive action (she is a reformer)

Cunning, cruel, unscrupulous, proud, self-satisfied, and then the question arises: "What the hell is the king?!". But do not forget that he is the best in the treatment of gray sickness.

No wars, uprisings, conflicts, crises and other problems.

He is cruel and belligerent, but he is good at motivating people to build ships quickly.

An excellent warrior, a commander, but broken by the death of his beloved. After the loss, he became a drunkard and a libertine, who knows who he would have been if Liana had stood next to him.

First it's all for the kids, then it's all for the house, later it's all for yourself. And where for the sake of the country?

The true king of Westeros, but of his allies there are only the Dothraki who killed him and Master Ilirio.

A powerful warrior and one of the leaders of the younger sons (mercenaries, which means there is some leadership experience). After Daenerys sailed to Westeros, he remained in charge of Slavers Bay.

Maybe not as powerful and smart as his brother, but still.

The entire people of Westeros are behind him, a skilled manipulator and schemer.

The option of Olenna Tyrell's rule is if the principled want a man on the iron throne.

He had attempts to become a good king, but he was a pawn in a big game and could not influence it.

Just for the beauty.

There's nothing to talk about, get out.

An experienced field commander, the leader of the noble house of Tarly, but a bad father.