Statistics: The disappointments of 2026

The season turned out to be overloaded with storylines, many of which did not affect the main conflict and seemed meaningless.Viewers complained about dummy episodes where nothing happened except the dialogues.

The audience notices that some parts of the film do not logically fit together, as if the director edited the individual parts at the wrong time, cut out something in parallel, and forgot to correct the text.

Many people were waiting for an accurate film adaptation of Silent Hill 2, but they got a mix: there are recognizable moments, but in general the plot was rewritten. Fans of the game were particularly sensitive to the changes in the character arcs.

In some episodes, the pace of the narrative seemed uneven: in some cases, events developed too quickly, and in others, on the contrary, it was delayed. This disrupted the rhythm, and some of the audience simply lost interest.

The film turned into a chaotic set of sketches. Many jokes just don't have time to unfold - they pass by, look outdated, or are too tied up in memes that quickly lose relevance.

There are too many lines in the season, and they don't fit together well. For example, a sharp genre turn did not always follow logically from what happened before.

To the audience, the plot seemed discordant and chaotic, as if the events were layered on top of each other without a clear logic.Alexey Rybnikov's familiar melodies were changed or replaced, but new compositions were not included.

Many felt that the script turned out to be weak in places, and the storylines were illogical or written for the shock effect, rather than for the sake of deep drama.

Many perceived the project as an attempt to "squeeze" the popularity of the original without offering a truly new look. It feels like the authors just inserted an animated version into an already familiar plot.

Many felt that the series was too slow and did not provide answers to the key questions that arose after the sixth episode. For example, the Bug line remained poorly disclosed.

Many viewers noted that the film turned out to be too slow and boring. The duration of 1 hour and 45 minutes seemed exhausting to many, especially for children.

The main problem that critics and viewers have noted is the cliched nature of the story. The plot follows the classic formula: Outsider hero, obstacles, chance, final match and happy ending

Viewers who loved the series for the intrigue and mysteries of the Circus expected the finale to be dedicated to unraveling its nature.However, the series shifted the focus to the character's inner experiences and psychological traumas.

The film relied too heavily on nostalgia: it repeated scenes from the first parts, introduced references to old events. Instead of offering fresh ideas, it created a sense of creative laziness.

Many have noticed that the film tries to combine too many different things.:gothic horror, romantic story, musical elements, social satire and a feminist theme.Because of this, it crumbles in places.

The turns were easy to guess, and closer to the finale, the film began to repeat itself, which caused the dynamics to sag. One of the viewers summarized: "It's like you're watching an old movie."

The plot is based on familiar genre cliches.: "from hate to love," "a bad guy saves a heroine from bullying." Many viewers noted that the story offers nothing new.

The creators tried to fit a large-scale story in just over two hours.Because of this, storylines often go in spurts.:important decisions of the characters seem to be crumpled, and motivations are not always revealed.

The audience notes:There are many beautifully designed scenes in the film that are not really related to the characters.The finale leaves a feeling of incompleteness, the film does not close the plot, but sets the stage for the next part.

Some viewers noted that the new medical cases and even individual lines seemed familiar from earlier seasons. Instead of offering fresh ideas, the authors largely repeated what they had already learned.

The film develops very rapidly, which sometimes makes the story seem chaotic. For viewers who are not immersed in the ENT of the game, it can be difficult to immediately understand the motives of the characters and the logic of events.

Viewers and critics pointed out contradictions in the logic of the world. For example, the AI system allegedly dramatically reduced crime, but at the same time it violates its own rules in key points.

The main plot sometimes faded into the background: key conflicts remained superficial or were resolved too quickly. As a result, the season felt not like a complete narrative, but like a multi-part trailer.

Many viewers felt that the series was basically a retelling of already familiar scenes from the movie "Major Thunder: The Game" (2024) with the addition of a small amount of new material.

Many noted that the story develops in leaps and bounds:events follow each other without a clear link, and some lines break off. The motivations of the characters sometimes look simplistic, and the pace slows down.

Many viewers complained that for most of the timekeeping, the characters simply wander through endless yellow corridors, and this quickly begins to tire. Waiting for the development of events is delayed

Viewers are used to vivid 18+ scenes, dramatic peaks and unexpected plot twists. In the fourth season, racy scenes ceased to be an event. The story is more like a children's fairy tale.

Many people note that the story of a team that knocks debts out of a corrupt tycoon turned out to be flat and devoid of depth. The characters are not revealed, their motivation remains unclear.

The main reason why the film did not appeal to many viewers was the conflict of their expectations with the author's idea. People went to the movies for the adventure and romance of Sherwood Forest, and got a heavy, slow drama.

Viewers and critics noted that some turns look strained, and some scenario solutions contradict internal logic.

The audience noted: They tried to cram a lot of things into the cartoon: science fiction, action, comedy, elements of a nature documentary and a detective story.Because of this, the story looked messy in some places.

Many viewers note that events are developing too slowly, and the timing of the episodes seems to be overblown due to unnecessary scenes that do not affect the plot.Some episodes seem long-winded and I don't add anything.